Why Youth Incarceration Fails: An Updated Review of the Evidence

Categories: ,

The Effects of Adolescent Development on Policing

Categories: ,

U.S. Age Boundaries of Delinquency 2015

Categories: ,

Create New Opportunities for “Persons In Need of Supervision” (PINS) to Succeed Without Legal System Intervention

Categories: ,

Centering Youth Voice in Juvenile Justice Reform: A Brief Summary Report of Youth Experiences

Categories: ,

Changing Course in Youth Detention: Reversing Widening Gaps by Race and Place

Categories: ,

The Annie E. Casey Found. (2023). The Annie E. Casey Foundation undertook a three-year analysis from January 2020 to January 2023 of the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on juvenile detention rates. The analysis concluded with three main findings: 1) Black youth were ten times more likely to be detained than white youth in 2023;…

National Public Defense Workload Study

Categories: ,

Nicholas M. Pace et al., Rand Corp. (2023). This report showcases the results of collaborative research on public defense workloads from the RAND Corporation, the National Center for State Courts, the American Bar Association Standing Committee on Legal Aid and Indigent Defense, and the Law Office of Lawyer Hanlon. This research is intended to update…

Indigent Criminal Defense and Commonwealth’s Attorneys: Report to the Governor and the General Assembly of Virginia

Categories: ,

Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (2023). This report examines the state of public defense in Virginia, as requested by the state’s Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission. Virginia has a hybrid public defense system comprised of either state-funded local public defender offices or private court-appointed defense attorneys compensated by the state. This report finds…

Gideon at Sixty: Advancing the Right to Counsel for Kids in Cuyahoga County

Categories: ,

The Wren Collective (2023). This independent report by the Wren Collective examines youth defense appointment practices in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, and finds that juvenile court judges are routinely assigning private attorneys over public defenders to represent youth in juvenile court. Specifically, the public defender’s office was appointed to 25% of the juvenile delinquency cases in…

ABA Ten Principles of a Public Defense Delivery System

Categories: ,

Am. Bar. Ass’n (2023). The American Bar Association released an updated version of their ten core principles for effective public defense delivery systems. These principles outline best practices for public defense systems and incorporate decades of case law, defense standards, and nationwide rules and practices. The Ten Principles include: 1) the independence of public defense…

Access to Justice Spotlight: Fines & Fees

Categories: ,

Off. for Access to Just., U.S. Dep’t of Just. (2023). The U.S. Department of Justice’s Office for Access to Justice issued this report as a follow up on the department’s Fines and Fees Dear Colleague letter. The report spotlights jurisdictions that have eliminated fines and fees for youth and adults through various mechanisms and highlights…

Engaging Black 2SLGBTQIA+ Youth in Advocacy

Categories: ,

Juvenile Court Statistics 2021

Categories: ,

In January 2024, the National Center for Juvenile Justice released their annual report detailing data trends in juvenile courts across the country from 2005 to 2021. This report provides a national snapshot of various trends in delinquency cases, including key demographic patterns across age, gender, and race at various stages of case processing. Notably, in…

The Probation Experience Project: Insights from Young People and Families

Categories: ,

Testimony of Josh Rovner Director of Youth Justice The Sentencing Project In Opposition to SB744 Before the Maryland Senate Committee on the Judiciary

Categories: ,

National Youth Defense System Standards

Categories: , , , , , , ,

Outlines steps that states must take to comply with the minimum requirements of the U.S. Constitution to protect the rights of youth facing deprivations of liberty.

Impact on Child Justice in a World of Digital Courts: Perspectives from the Bench

Categories: , ,

Only Young Once: Alabama’s Overreliance on School Pushout and For-Profit Youth Incarceration 

Categories: ,

What We Need to Thrive: A Youth-Led Vision for a Just Alameda County 

Categories: , ,

The Ella Baker Center for Human Rights and Ceres Policy Research Center partnered with youth leaders in Alameda County, California, to assess the current landscape of the juvenile legal system and outline a youth-centered vision for the future. Utilizing a youth participatory action research protocol, this report relied on youth leaders to design and implement…

One in Five: How Mass Incarceration Deepens Inequality and Harms Public Safety

Categories: ,

Developing Statutes for Competence to Stand Trial in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings: A Guide for Lawmakers

Categories: ,

Futures in the Balance: Examples of How Juvenile Court Hurts Youth and Communities

Categories: , ,

Involvement with the delinquency system—including arrests, charges that get dismissed, and adjudications— can create obstacles to a young person’s success. Many youth experience overwhelming hurdles because their juvenile records are available to the public, appear on background checks, or create long-term debt from fines and fees, which can result in denial of employment, housing, loans,…

Futures in the Balance: Disrupting the School-to-Prison Pipeline

Categories: , ,

Key Points: Testing limits is normal adolescent behavior. Young people act out, make mistakes, and push boundaries largely because the parts of their brains that regulate these behaviors are still being formed. Diverting youth from the legal system by keeping them in school can result in better life outcomes for young people. The legal system…

Joint Statement on the Importance of Specialization of Judges, Prosecutors, and Defenders in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings

Categories: ,

Seeing What’s Underneath: A Resource for Understanding Behavior & Using Language in Juvenile Court

Categories: , , , ,

The words we choose have a significant impact on the young people we serve. We may inadvertently use language laden with bias, disapproval, and negative judgment that can impact youths’ perceptions of themselves. Our language can also impact our own thinking and decision-making. In Part I of this guide, we hope to break down some…