Ensuring Access: A Policy Advocacy Toolkit (2018)

Categories: , ,

Access Denied found that “[n]o jurisdiction in the United States wholly fulfills the constitutional promise of justice for children.” So, no matter where you live and practice, your jurisdiction can improve. As juvenile defense advocates, we have a responsibility to identify and work to correct systemic deficiencies and to honor our clients’ dignity and well-being.…

Arizona Bringing Gault Home: An Assessment of Access to and Quality of Juvenile Defense Counsel (2018)

Categories: , ,

District of Columbia: An Assessment of Access to and Quality of Juvenile Defense Counsel (2018)

Categories: , ,

The National Juvenile Defender Center (NJDC), in partnership with our regional juvenile defender centers and other key stakeholders, has embarked on a nationwide strategy to assess access to and quality of juvenile defense afforded to youth in conflict with the law. Because juvenile justice systems are a state and local responsibility, rather than a federal…

Juvenile Defender Post-Disposition Practice Tool

Categories: , ,

Heavy workloads and the culture in many courts can make it difficult for juvenile defenders to stay connected to clients post-disposition. Even after disposition in juvenile court, young people face legal issues that affect — and often threaten — their liberty, their safety, their due process and civil rights, and their access to future opportunities.…

A Developmental Framework for Juvenile Disposition and Post-Disposition Advocacy

Categories: , ,

An infographic outlining strategies for post-disposition advocacy.

The Effects of Perceived Phenotypic Racial Stereotypicality and Social Identity Threat on Racial Minorities’ Attitudes About Police

Categories: , ,

This study examines the role of perceived phenotypic racial stereotypicality and race-based social identity threat on racial minorities’ trust and cooperation with police. We hypothesize that in police interactions, racial minorities’ phenotypic racial stereotypicality may increase race-based social identity threat, which will lead to distrust and decreased participation with police. Racial minorities (Blacks, Latinos, Native…

Unlocking Youth: Strong Juvenile Defense

Categories: ,

Delaware: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Representation in Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings (2017)

Categories: , ,

NJDC’s expert investigators visited Delaware’s three counties, where they conducted interviews with ODS staff and other juvenile court stakeholders, observed delinquency proceedings, and obtained information and reports from the Delaware Family Courts. Investigators also completed a statutory review of the state’s court rules, laws, and proposed legislation. It was readily apparent that those responsible for…

Memorandum of Agreement Between the United States Department of Justice and the St. Louis County Family Court

Categories: ,

Role of Juvenile Defense Counsel Post-Disposition (2016)

Categories: , ,

Disposition orders—commonly understood as sentencing—move children deeper into the juvenile court system. For example, some youth might be confined to secure custody or placed on probation. During the “post-disposition” phase, defenders must represent children at all probation and parole review or modification hearings, advise clients of their legal rights, explain their case options and possible…

Increasing Juvenile Appeals: An Underused Critical Check on the Juvenile Delinquency System

Categories: , ,

A one-page infographic on juvenile appeal rates.

Locked Up: Fear, Racism, Prison Economics, and the Incarceration of Native Youth

Categories: ,

In the national conversation about youth overincarceration and disproportionate minority contact in the juvenile legal system, Native American youth are often statistically invisible. Closer attention, however, reveals that Native youth who come into contact with the juvenile legal system are more likely to be locked in secure confinement than other youth, with disproportionality rates in…

Juvenile Defense Self-Assessment Tool

Categories: , ,

The Juvenile Committee of the National Association for Public Defense (NAPD) and the National Juvenile Defender Center (NJDC) have developed a Self-Assessment Tool that is intended to create an opportunity to reflect on practices in your office that you may not have considered before. We hope you will complete this assessment and fairly consider the…

United States Department of Justice Investigation of the St. Louis County Family Court, St. Louis, Missouri

Categories: ,

Issue Brief-Protecting Rights, Promoting Positive Outcomes: Post-Disposition Access to Counsel

Categories: , ,

After the disposition (sentencing) phase in juvenile court, a case moves into what may be the longest and most critical phase of the delinquency process—post-disposition. Post-disposition advocacy is vital to safeguard the constitutional rights of adjudicated youth and aid in community reintegration, and it encompasses a broad array of issues that affect adjudicated youth; yet,…

Appeals: A Critical Check on the Juvenile Delinquency System

Categories: , ,

A robust and expeditious juvenile appellate practice ensures that youth are fully accorded their due process rights and is essential to developing a strong and cohesive body of juvenile jurisprudence. All children have a right to appeal their juvenile adjudications. Juvenile defenders are constitutionally mandated to confer with their young clients about their right to…

Issue Brief-Advancing Post-Disposition Representation to Protect the Due Process Rights of Youth and Promote Positive Youth Outcomes

Categories: , ,

Post-disposition advocacy encompasses a broad array of issues that affect adjudicated youth. Such advocacy may entail engaging in appellate work; monitoring and engaging in direct advocacy related to safety, conditions of confinement, and parole; monitoring the implementation of disposition plans and actively participating in review hearings to ensure that the court is accurately informed about…

The Use of Juvenile Statements Made in Uncounseled Interviews, Assessments, and Evaluations: A Survey of National Practices

Categories: , ,

As stakeholders in the juvenile justice system try to reconcile the due process rights of children with the rehabilitative goal of the juvenile justice system, an understanding of the vast array of approaches being used may be helpful. To that end, NJDC has compiled this survey of statutes and cases from around the country that…

Models for Change Innovation Brief: Addressing the Legal Needs of Youth After Disposition

Categories: ,

ABA Waiver Resolution and Report

Categories: ,

Juvenile Defender Self-Assessment Tool for Best Practices in Detention Advocacy

Categories: , ,

This tool is designed to assist juvenile defenders in assessing the quality of their detention advocacy. Defenders should check the box next to each step that they regularly take on behalf of a typical client. Upon completion of the checklist, defenders should review their answers to self-identify any gaps in their detention advocacy.

Missouri-Justice Rationed: An Assessment of Access to Counsel and Quality of Juvenile Defense Representation in Delinquency Proceedings (2013)

Categories: , ,

While Missouri stands out for its innovation in providing small, regionalized juvenile corrections programs, an effective juvenile justice system is not built solely upon the corrections options available to youth after they have navigated their way through a complex legal process. An effective juvenile justice system must encompass the foundational elements of fundamental fairness and…

Models for Change Innovation Brief: Using Risk Assessment to Meet Needs and Reduce Recidivism

Categories: ,

Risk Assessment in Juvenile Justice: A Guidebook for Implementation

Categories: ,

The Harmful Use of Isolation in Juvenile Facilities: The Need for Post-Disposition Representation

Categories: ,