Challenging the Status Quo: Mobilizing Youth Defense Teams to Uphold Youth Rights & Uproot Injustice

Categories: , ,

This Racial Justice Webinar was hosted by the Gault Center and Georgetown Law’s Juvenile Justice Clinic & Initiative on May 29, 2024. The webinar focused on a collective call to action for the youth defense community to transform the juvenile legal system by centering youth and their constitutional rights to freedom, liberty, and equality. This…

Amicus Brief: In the Interest of D.C.M.

Categories: ,

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pemiscot County, Division I Thirty-Fourth Judicial Circuit, Pemiscot County No. 18PE-JU00022 The Honorable W. Keith Currie, Judge

Case Law Incorporating Specific Racial Justice Arguments

Categories: , ,

This document is updated regularly to include the latest case law from across the country discussing racial justice issues.

Early Access to Counsel in Police Precincts Data Collection Practices & Recommendations

Categories: ,

Early Access to Counsel in Police Precincts Best Practices and Recommendations

Categories: ,

Early Access to Legal Counsel for Youth: An Implementation Study of California Senate Bills 395 and 203

Categories: ,

Why (Jury-Less) Juvenile Courts Are Unconstitutional

Categories: ,

In the Interest of J.A.T.

Categories: ,

Making Children Pay: The Hidden Cost to Kansas of Juvenile Fines and Fees

Categories: ,

From the introduction: “The goal of the Kansas juvenile legal system is ‘to promote public safety, hold juvenile offenders accountable for their behavior and improve their ability to live more productively and responsibly in their community.’ Evidence shows that juvenile fees and fines do the opposite. This report outlines the ways in which fees and…

State v. Oscar R. Juracan-Juracan

Categories: ,

The Court considers a question of first impression — whether a criminal defendant must be provided in-person interpreting services, rather than video remote interpreting (VRI) services, at his jury trial.

Amicus Brief from National Association of Judiciary Interpreters & Translators and the American Translators Association in State v. Oscar R. Juracan-Juracan

Categories: ,

   

DOJ Dear Colleague Letter on Fines and Fees

Categories: ,

“You Have the Right to Keep Quiet”: Translation Inadequacies in Nevada’s Spanish Miranda Warning 

Categories: ,

The landmark case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the United States Supreme Court required law enforcement agencies to advise all suspects of their “Miranda warnings,” or Constitutional protections, prior to interrogation. Previous research demonstrates that the Miranda warnings in the United States are largely unregulated and highlights how inadequate translations can impact comprehensibility. The present study…

Ensuring Access for Youth of Color: Raising Race in Policy Advocacy- A Toolkit

Categories: , ,

This resource is from the appendix to “Ensuring Access: A Policy Advocacy Toolkit.” Access Denied found that “[n]o jurisdiction in the United States wholly fulfills the constitutional promise of justice for children.” So, no matter where you live and practice, your jurisdiction can improve. As juvenile defense advocates, we have a responsibility to identify and…