NJDC Virtual Hearings and Due Process Presentation

Categories: ,

On May 5, 2021, NJDC presented at an Illinois Summit about our report, Due Process in the Time of COVID. The presentation may be useful to other jurisdictions as they consider continuing to use technology to hold court hearings virtually as the pandemic wanes.

In the Interest of J.A.T.

Categories: ,

In the Interest of C.A.R.A.

Categories: ,

Impact on Child Justice in a World of Digital Courts: Perspectives from the Bench

Categories: , ,

Remote Justice: Communication in the Virtual Courtroom Summary

Categories: ,

Remote Justice: Communication in the Virtual Courtroom Brief

Categories: , , ,

Guidance to Juvenile Courts on Conducting Remote Hearings During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Categories: , ,

Guidance for juvenile courts and a checklist on remote hearings during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Navigating Virtual Proceedings in Juvenile Court: A Guide for Judges

Categories: , ,

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, juvenile courts across the country have adopted video and teleconferencing to conduct virtual hearings. Although initially embraced as an emergency measure, virtual proceedings continue to be utilized even as jurisdictions increasingly lift restrictions on in-person hearings. This new “hybrid” model is being heralded as a groundbreaking way to…

Sample Motion Opposing Trial by Videoconferencing Technology

Categories: , , ,

The Effect of Mediation on Impression Formation: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Video-Mediated Conditions

Categories: , ,

Research on Videoconferencing at Post-Arraignment Release Hearings: Phase I Final Report

Categories: , ,

Practice Tips to Remember in Video Court

Categories: , ,

Juvenile Defender Checklist on Remote Hearings During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Categories: , , ,

As a general principle and under normal circumstances, the National Juvenile Defender Center (NJDC) strongly opposes the use of remote hearings in juvenile delinquency proceedings. Remote hearings present serious due process concerns, as they create insurmountable barriers to effective assistance of counsel, harm attorney-client relationships and confidentiality, and lead to worse outcomes for youth. However,…

State v. Oscar R. Juracan-Juracan

Categories: ,

The Court considers a question of first impression — whether a criminal defendant must be provided in-person interpreting services, rather than video remote interpreting (VRI) services, at his jury trial.

Amicus Brief from National Association of Judiciary Interpreters & Translators and the American Translators Association in State v. Oscar R. Juracan-Juracan

Categories: ,